(May 7, 2018 at 9:50 am)Mathilda Wrote:(May 7, 2018 at 9:16 am)Drich Wrote: Are you kidding?
I was bann in 2016 abruptly because of something I said in 2008. The morons on that web site could not find cause to ban me for anything current, in fact I remember I was rightfully having my way with a few of the heavy hitters over there including you and next time I signed on I was just got a screen that I was bann, no reason given. I had to sneak on as a guest to find out why I was kicked off. even a few of your members over there spoke out against how badly the mods handled that one. You are were impotently being forced feed and you only recourse was to go back to 20012 or 2008 or when ever I was originally ban, and if you honestly looked at why I was ban then it was for the same thing. You had no way to control me or protect your heavy hitters pride, it was all at my digression because i did indeed follow the rules and had sound theological arguments.
People can see for themselves, You really struggled as I gave you more rope to hang yourself with and the contradictions started piling up. All I did was ask questions.
http://www.thethinkingatheist.com/forum/...-questions
are you a clinton, seriously? I went line by line page by page for 10 weeks and 22 pages of monster dialog per thread, and never once did you address any of the failures in basic christian comprehension I posted.. You know the critical errors in understanding that would have you assume a paradox in logic or an error in critical thinking, when comparing an answer I gave against what you understand my belief to be....
To this you said I struggled after 22 pages and 10 weeks/2 and 1/2 months to which I retain the final word. Seriously? your best efforts amount in name calling and trying to make me out to to be a hypocrite, all the while I had one arm tied behind my back in that I was not allowed to ask you/redirect any questions to you which allowed you to be on the offense the whole time...
You are seriously deluded if you think you came out on top in that exchange. ask anyone on this web site who is not a devoted fan of yours if a 22 page 2 and a half month of onslaught where you were on the attack and I on the defense (by Rule other wise you would not 'debate') is an example of me struggling. And you left the debate and would not address your repeated errors in miscatorgrizing the form of Christianity I was representing. it seems to me you only know of Catholicism and everyone must be catholic if the are christian.. or rather that is the only way you could get your contradictions/onslaught to work. Ignore my corrections and just repeat the same question adnauism. till you gave up and stopped responding.
