RE: Open discussion of the Christian Why We're Here thread
May 15, 2018 at 9:10 am
(This post was last modified: May 15, 2018 at 9:15 am by Neo-Scholastic.)
(May 15, 2018 at 8:45 am)Hammy Wrote:(May 14, 2018 at 8:57 pm)RoadRunner79 Wrote: His answer involves not just the evidence or reasons, but also the logical consequences that follow from such changes to ones basic principles.
Which is actually more pragmatic than accurate...
Regardless of consequences some things are true and other things aren't. Right?
That itself is 2 assumptions - ontological and epistemological. Maybe there is no "how things actually are"; there aren't objects to which we can attribute anything. And even if there were objects how would you know that you had gained knowledge of them?
<insert profound quote here>
