Best Theistic Arguments

[Angrboda]

I on the other hand base my statements on evidence.  
NDEs are evidence.  

NDEs are evidence that vibrations are alive, or that life only comes from life?  You're obviously on crack.

Obviously you haven't read much of NDEs experiences or you do not believe them in any case.
If you would have you would have noticed that almost all of them talk about vibrations and how all is connected to each other.

Incidentally, in reviewing several NDEs I came across the following NDE account in which the experiencer created multiple NDEs by taking the drug ketamine. So much for your claim that NDEs cannot be caused by chemicals in the brain. I think that's the end of any justification for believing uncorroborated NDE content.

https://www.nderf.org/Experiences/1fred_b_ketamine.html

---

Let's take this another direction so that I can illustrate one of the points I have about evidence from NDEs. Let's say, for the sake of argument, that last night I dreamed that I left my body and traveled to heaven where I met God and Jesus. They explained to me that God is the ground of being, that anything which happens in life is because He is causing it. The explanation for why vibrations exist is because He is causing them to vibrate. I happen to believe that the things that happen in dreams are actually real. (And we have evidence from prophetic dreams, both in the bible [here], as well as contemporary accounts that things dreamed about do in some cases reveal things the dreamer could not have known independent of the dream.) Now, given that I had a dream which showed me that vibrations are not alive, and that some dream content is independently corroborated, do I have justification for believing that vibrations are not alive based on this dream that I had?