Little Rik Wrote:surreptitious57 Wrote:As an atheist I say there is no evidence for a creator rather than there is no creator
But I think that the lack of evidence makes the existence of said creator less likely
Life and non life are not fixed states but instead points on a spectrum
A creator is not required in order for biology to come from chemistry
All of existence is transition because everything is in a constant state of motion
The transition from non life to life is but just one point on this eternal spectrum
And so it is therefore no more or no less important than any other one really is
It is only human beings who think some events are more important than others
You fail very badly mate
By saying...........The transition from non life to life...........you already pretend that a non life exist right?
Where on earth is the non life Surr?
Where is the evidence that a non life exist?
That is exactly the question that I keep on asking to yog and that she keep on avoiding
Cant you see that atheism is based only on guesses and dreams?
For the first 800 million years there was no life on Earth as chemistry was not sufficiently complex for it to have developed during this time
When it did become sufficiently complex then life evolved and it had to come from non life because biology cannot exist without chemistry
Also atheism has nothing to do with either evolution or abiogenesis
A MIND IS LIKE A PARACHUTE : IT DOES NOT WORK UNLESS IT IS OPEN