(May 21, 2018 at 8:48 pm)Huggy74 Wrote:(May 21, 2018 at 8:22 pm)Hammy Wrote: Just because he wouldn't say that they were a moral being doesn't mean that we can't look at the same evidence but conclude they are moral beings by simply defining morality differently.
I'm sure your no credential having self can conclude anything you want... Why does anyone have to take you seriously though?
Because people with real knowledge of science can evaluate whether he knows something of what he is talking about.
That is unlike you, who thinks Bible is adaquate substitute for real knowledge of, well, anything, and as a result struts about with an moronic attitude like a baffoon as if time wasted with your bible qualifies you to be a worthy participant in discussion about, well, anything.
