FFS Huggy just completely ignored my point about the difference between providing evidence and interpreting that evidence. How many times do I have to repeat it? The whole point of being a scientist is to question critically whether your peers are drawing the correct conclusions from the evidence that they are presenting. I do not think De Waal is. I think the evidence he is providing demonstrates morality in animals. I am not going to repeat this a fourth time for Huggy.
And now Huggy is debating AI with me? Fucking me? If he even can't get his head around the scientific method then how the fuck is he going to understand how the various AI techniques work?
Huggy I have a far more in-depth understanding about the fundamental nature of intelligence both natural and artificial and their implementation than you will ever have.
And now Huggy is debating AI with me? Fucking me? If he even can't get his head around the scientific method then how the fuck is he going to understand how the various AI techniques work?
Huggy I have a far more in-depth understanding about the fundamental nature of intelligence both natural and artificial and their implementation than you will ever have.
