(May 28, 2018 at 7:18 am)Jörmungandr Wrote:(May 26, 2018 at 11:11 am)Little Rik Wrote:(May 26, 2018 at 11:11 am)Little Rik Wrote: 1) I didn't say that inanimate matter is conscious.
I rather say that matter has got consciousness or it is made of consciousness and this consciousness is in a latent form which means that matter can not be aware of who she is.
To say ............Inanimate matter is conscious.......is like to say that matter can express herself which is not the case.
The stupidity lies in the original ideas, not my representation of them. There is no difference between saying that matter "has got consciousness" and that matter "is conscious." Moreover, since you yourself have said that consciousness is an abstract, and therefore non-physical, you are saying that the physical is made up of the non-physical, a contradiction. It's more a problem that your ideas are filled with metaphysical inconsistency and error. Wittgenstein has said that most philosophical problems are not problems of philosophy but problems of language. Your moronic dogmas are a case in point. You'd do well to heed Wittgenstein's words and pull your head out of your ass before you drown in your own shit.
Wrong again yog.
You can have something but you may not be aware of.
That is what matter have.
Being made of the same factors that are in all other form of life matter got to have consciousness that however doesn't mean that she is aware of.
Awareness come after evolution take place and because matter hasn't yet gone through the evolution process is obvious that she does not have any awareness of what she is.
(more replies as the time allow)
