Meh. I'd take Hume's lead and give it a twist: whatever the evidence for God you have is, there is a more probable explanation that is not God. I don't see how you get around that basic argument (with Hume, contra miracles). I'll be doing some reading on that soon, but failing any great revelation, that holds. That and it is, I believe, in principle, impossible to demonstrate any property which is by its nature unlimited (e.g. omnipotence).
![[Image: extraordinarywoo-sig.jpg]](https://i.postimg.cc/zf86M5L7/extraordinarywoo-sig.jpg)