Evil Atheists

[Darwinian]

So far there has been a variey of responses, from "atheists are moral too" (not relevant) up to and including sky wizard hilarity (so clever). Yet no-one has addressed the problem of subjective morality when two opposing subjective viewpoints meet. Its descended into the expected undergraduate hilarious wit (see sky wizards etc) and personal attacks based on assumptions made about my personal beliefs. Is that the best that the "new atheists" can offer? I think the future of theism is safe in your hands people, just keep up the juvenile insults and avoidance of philosophical lines of questioning, repeating off the peg responses seems the be the order of the day, especially if they are non-relevant but get a round of applause from the choir...

Translation:

"I have given you a question for which I will never be satisfied with any and all answers you may give because the viewpoint that I personally hold is the only viewpoint that has any credibility and all opposing viewpoints are to be ignored or, more desirably, deliberately misunderstood in an attempt to shift attention away from the obvious irrational and woolly thinking nature of my argument so that when I leave this discussion I can tell all my friends that atheists are irrational and predictable when in reality I know full well that my argument had been completely refuted but I am too stubborn to either accept or appreciate the validity of any opposing arguments because to do so would be to agree with those whom I feel morally and intellectually superior over and that can never be allowed to happen, for I am a Christian and my interpretation of this faith is the only true path."