(July 11, 2018 at 12:17 pm)RoadRunner79 Wrote:(July 11, 2018 at 12:07 pm)Brian37 Wrote: The president is DIRECTLY related to SCOTUS picks. You cannot separate that fact.
I am being fair and as I said this kind of talk from a judge is dangerous, and do not tell me that if Clinton or Obama made a pick that said the same thing, you'd buy it then.
OVERSIGHT has to be in the moment, not after the fact. We have judges and courts for a reason, we have the power of impeachment for a reason.
I hate to rain on your parade politics matter and our laws matter and the overlap is there and cannot be cherry picked.
And again, do not expect me to apologize. The only one missing the point in this thread is you.
I don’t think you can say I’m missing the point, when you quote out off context, and against things I’m not saying. You have a reading (listening) problem.
What is out of context?
The president nominates the SCOTUS, or am I making that up?
Do we want to live in a society under laws that make it harder to remove abuse of power?
"Wait until they leave office" is a horrible suggestion. That is asking for trouble.