What is wrong with FW?

[Little Rik]

You can be as moral and virtuous as you like but there is something that even the most moral and virtuous people never think about and that is the fact that in order to reach the high of human emancipation a person must feel for the highest of the high which lie within in each of us.

People in general look outside when in fact the real gem lie inside so when I take decisions I always try to think to act in a way that my outer consciousness get closer and closer to my inner consciousness.
If you want to reach the moon you got to reduce the distance that separate you from the moon that is why I use my FW as an instrument to help to reduce the distance that separate me from the goal of life.

Most moral and virtuous people have different goals instead.
They lack a real attraction for the inner gem.  

Those are some pretty words, but they don't actually mean shit.  What do you actually do that is different?  I'm not interested in your philosophy.  That's just the religious dogma that you believe.  And since you are following dogma about what is what, instead of actually engaging with it, your concentration on any "inner gem" likely leads you to being oblivious to actual morals and virtue.  But we've already seen evidence of this with your continual insults and your absurd belief that calling someone a fool or an idiot is merely making an observation.  The evidence seems to be that you know fuckall about morality and karma and just blindly follow whatever your religion tells you.

But thanks for the glimpse into your psyche.  Inner and outer consciousness.  Bahahahaha.

What are you whining about?  
What my philosophy has got to do with all?  

Didn't I explained to you that what it make the difference is the attraction towards the goal of life?  
Without the feeling for the attraction towards the object of you desire nothing will work even the most moral and virtuous attitude.

Is this so difficult to understand?  

---

Of course, at the quantum level, it's my understanding that everything is unpredictable; even non-life. Do these unpredictabilities multiply upwards in life systems? Probably, but there needs to be some sort of metric for it to be a fair comparison. How exactly you'd go about making the metric, I don't know.

It's always struck me that life just has more going on than non-life, possibly manifesting as more densely populated events/uncertainties. I may be talking out my ass here of course. I'm going through a new experimental phase of brainstorming all sorts of ideas, and it seems to help me avoid any dogmatic pitfalls I may be unaware of.

Mate.  

I think I will nominate you for the next Nobel prize in physics for discovering that there is non-life.

Whhhhhhhoooooooo great job rob.
Now all the laws in physics that say that everything is made of vibrations will have to be changed.


Look mate, don't take any notice from what this link say.
From now on we all will have to believe that there is non-life.

https://www.one-mind-one-energy.com/Law-...ation.html