The foundations of William L. Craigs "science" proven wrong?

[Arthur Dent]

William Craig advocates a theory of time called the A-theory/temporal becoming, made possible if the aether theory of H.A. Lorentz is reintroduced to generate God's very one special time.

If A-theory of time is true, in the Lorentz-aether sense, compatible with relativity. How can space-time ripple, i.e. gravitational waves? What puzzles me is that different parts of such a space-time ripple would not exist at the same time - some part would be in the future and some part would be in the past, and almost no part would be in the present?? Yet it seems gravitons have been detected:

http://news.stanford.edu/news/2014/march...31714.html

http://www.reasonablefaith.org/god-and-t...ng-of-time

[CapnAwesome]

William Craig has extremely flexible points of view. I'm sure if something is proven wrong it won't upset his worldview but rather he'll embrace something else that proves his God. If God is so mighty, he wouldn't need William Craig to defend him, he could do it himself.

[Endo]

Didn't we beat "(a)ether" to death last century?

Ah yes. Mikey Mor! Here we go.

And at this point, I'd like to posit that Christians aren't necessarily stupid, they're just incredibly slow at picking up science. Remember that whole Galileo debacle?

[LastPoet]

Didn't we beat "(a)ether" to death last century?

Ah yes. Mikey Mor! Here we go.

And at this point, I'd like to posit that Christians aren't necessarily stupid, they're just incredibly slow at picking up science. Remember that whole Galileo debacle?

That is a quite naive interpretation. Don't forget that WLC has made a mint selling Bullshit.

[Minimalist]

And at this point, I'd like to posit that Christians aren't necessarily stupid, they're just incredibly slow at picking up science. Remember that whole Galileo debacle?

I'll stick with "stupid," thank you very much. And gullible. If xtians claim some dead jew came back to life for their fucking sins they'll believe anything.

[Rabb Allah]

WIlliam Lane Craid, a PhD in Philosophy and he cannot even make a philosophically sound argument for ontology. Pitiful