RE: Peterson's 12 Rules For Life, have you heard of this?
August 10, 2018 at 12:20 pm
(This post was last modified: August 10, 2018 at 12:22 pm by bennyboy.)
(August 10, 2018 at 9:16 am)Tizheruk Wrote:Quote:At any rate, are you just going to keep quoting rationalwiki's distilled quotes out of context, or are you actually going to watch some of the videos, in which Peterson directly addresses some of these points made against him, and clarifies his position candidly? Do you have any issues of your own with him, or your own ideas, or are you just going to keep quote-mining?1. Yup quoted rational i make no hidden fact about that too bad for you they a neither out of context or distilled
2.I have watched his video's and seen his responses . They are not responses and often are more confused then the original statement and generally ignore the actual point his critics were making.Then tries to wiggle out of being called out .Like most cult leaders .
3. None of these lack context and you can call them distilled i would prefer accurate and in context
4.I have made issues clear but please keep screaming "out of context " like a fundie protecting his bible .
1. You seem not to know what the word "context" means.
2. ?
3. Apparently you would NOT prefer that. Why don't you watch the videos I linked, so you can see him actually address the issues you are talking about? You and I both know you won't bother, but that's because you can't come up with ideas that you can't copy and paste.
4. Again. . . learn what context means, and then provide some for your quotes.
Quote:Quote:You have a lot to say for a guy who so far has watched a 1-minute video clip and spent about 5 seconds googling.You have a lot to say for a man who slaps up a video up then proclaims his lord and savior has defeated all comers and he has deep and complete understanding of him and then screams "out of context " at every criticism like a religious zealot . So spare me the lecture.
Hmmmm. . . that's a strangely fictional account. It seems you think your made-up narrative for what happened is a fair proxy for real events. That seems pretty typical of your ideology-- it doesn't matter what is true, only what you can find a way to get hysterical about.
The only thing I've "proclaimed" about Peterson is that he's addressed these issues in a much more measured and thoughtful way than you credit him, and that the videos I linked would be likely to demonstrate that.
