Peterson's 12 Rules For Life, have you heard of this?

[Amarok]

I barely know, lol, but he claimed this Peterson guy made a bunch of misogynistic statements, and when asked for evidence, he just repeats his claim and tells other people to find the evidence themselves.  Which, Ofc, is ridiculous as he well knows.  If a theist were debating this way he’d be all over them.

A feminist philosopher makes the case against Jordan Peterson
https://www.vox.com/conversations/2018/6...philosophy

Jordan Peterson, Custodian of the Patriarchy
https://www.nytimes.com/2018/05/18/style...-life.html

Why Are So Many Young Men Drawn to Jordan Peterson’s Intellectual Misogyny?
https://blog.apaonline.org/2018/02/20/wh...-misogyny/

Seemed easy enough for me.

Oh but kit those are all out of context .Remember anything that paints Peterson in a negative light is just his enemies smearing him .Any quotes you present of him are out of context or quote mines. And anytime you watch his videos and you come to negative conclusion it's just because have not watched enough because Peterson has already refuted your objections and his words are what you are to believe over your own mind .

---

You haven’t provided any evidence.  Period.  You can “stand by it” for as long as you like, but if you can’t back it up, then you’re standing by nothing more than a bald assertion

What i said is true period and will stand by it .It's already back up by the fact it's true .So call it what you will .

---

If I was part of an organization that built entire dozens of careers on sexual provocative-Ness I would be very careful about like waiving the ethical flag in the sexual wars. 

Admittedly, he hedges his words a bit more than you've outright said, and he does do his trademark backtrack but that subtext really seems to shine through. He doesn't outright say that victims of sexual harassment shouldn't complain, but he does talk a great bit about how they're complicit in their own harassment of they at all sexualise themselves.

Seriously, if your opponent is saying they have any trouble looking up sources they look up, point them in the right direction. If you have to, show them exactly what you're talking about.

Now watch Benny scream out of context your misquoting him his philosophy is far too broad for mere mortals to understand you have to watch a billion hours of video and 10 books by him to understand a basic point and lastly he didn't say he was having trouble in fact the total opposite because benny understands him so well as he keeps claiming.

---

So, he should have done that. That’s how this works.

Nope my way works just as well

---

 If a theist were debating this way he’d be all over them.

Not really because i have been told by theist  too look it up and i have which is why i know what their saying is wrong .