(August 16, 2018 at 1:49 pm)The Valkyrie Wrote:(August 16, 2018 at 9:16 am)Jörmungandr Wrote: I can see an argument for murderers, according to lex talionalis, but rapists? That seems to run afoul of the cruel and inhuman punishment constraint, and I don't see a way to ethically recommend it. If you're arguing simply that you would find it emotionally satisfying, that's something else. As with Amanda, I have the same question about it's rationality and ethicality. A commonly given example is the man who catches someone raping his daughter, and beats the rapist to death with a baseball bat. His actions are certainly understandable, and we can empathize with him emotionally, yet at the same time not be willing to endorse his beating the rapist to death as either legal, or an ethically justifiable response to the crime of rape. I take it Amanda has quit the thread, but I'd have to ask the same question of her that I ask of you. Is your stance towards serial rapists and kiddie fiddlers an emotional one, like that of the father with the baseball bat, or is it a calmly reasoned response?
Yes, they should. And if you have to ask why, then I question your humanity.
1. I'm talking serial rapists. But I'm open to alternatives. Like life in prison.
You didn't answer the question.
![[Image: extraordinarywoo-sig.jpg]](https://i.postimg.cc/zf86M5L7/extraordinarywoo-sig.jpg)