RE: In UK atheists considred more moral than theists.
August 28, 2018 at 12:58 pm
(This post was last modified: August 28, 2018 at 1:08 pm by Anomalocaris.)
(August 28, 2018 at 12:42 pm)Huggy74 Wrote:(August 28, 2018 at 12:35 pm)Mathilda Wrote: Wtf are you going on about Huggy? How is that relevant?
There are animals that are capable of seeing up to at least 4 primary colors.
My question to you is; can you name a fourth primary color?
It's relevant because you stated we could detect primary colors using devices... so name a fourth primary color... got it?
The name of the forth primary color is, quite remarkably, “the forth primary color”. It is actually not trivial to fathom just how dumb you must be to either think:
1. This really is a meaningful question, OR
2. This can possible be an effective bluster.
You can call it wazoo if you want. In real life, what you call it doesn’t matter. Whether you know it’s attributes, does. If you are tetrachromatic, your eyes can directly help, but not much. But whether you are tetrachromatic, trichromatic, or totally color blind, devices can always help, a lot.
Got it?
The forth primary color is in all ways identical to the other three, except it reflect a forth wavelength to which the retinal cells of some animals (and very few humans) also exhibit a sensitivity peak. Most mammals with color vision have retinal cells exhibiting peak sensitivity only at 2 or 3 different wave lengths.
You do realize the three primary colors aren’t the same to all trichromatic humans, that People who read some of the patterns in the colored dots differently from other people at your optometrist’s office are actually seeing slightly different primary colors than other people, alone other trichromatic animals, right? Of course not.