Our server costs ~$56 per month to run. Please consider donating or becoming a Patron to help keep the site running. Help us gain new members by following us on Twitter and liking our page on Facebook!
Current time: September 5, 2026, 11:05 pm

Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
In UK atheists considred more moral than theists.
RE: In UK atheists considred more moral than theists.
(August 28, 2018 at 12:42 pm)Huggy74 Wrote:
(August 28, 2018 at 12:35 pm)Mathilda Wrote: Wtf are you going on about  Huggy? How is that relevant?

There are animals that are capable of seeing up to at least 4 primary colors.

My question to you is; can you name a fourth primary color?

It's relevant because you stated we could detect primary colors using devices... so name  a fourth primary color... got it?

The name of the forth primary color is, quite remarkably, “the forth primary color”.    It is actually not trivial to fathom just how dumb you must be to either think:

1. This really is a meaningful question, OR

2. This can possible be an effective bluster.

You can call it wazoo if you want.  In real life, what you call it doesn’t matter.  Whether you know it’s attributes, does.  If you are tetrachromatic, your eyes can directly help, but not much. But whether you are tetrachromatic, trichromatic, or totally color blind, devices can always help, a lot.

Got it?

The forth primary color is in all ways identical to the other three, except it reflect a forth wavelength to which the retinal cells of some animals (and very few humans) also exhibit a sensitivity peak.   Most mammals with color vision have retinal cells exhibiting peak sensitivity only at 2 or 3 different wave lengths.

You do realize the three primary colors aren’t the same to all trichromatic humans, that People who read some of the patterns in the colored dots differently from other people at your optometrist’s office are actually seeing slightly different primary colors than other people,  alone other trichromatic animals, right?  Of course not.
Reply



Messages In This Thread
RE: In UK atheists considred more moral than theists. - by Anomalocaris - August 28, 2018 at 12:58 pm
RE: In UK atheists considred more moral than theists. - by Drich - September 10, 2018 at 12:59 pm
RE: In UK atheists considred more moral than theists. - by Drich - September 10, 2018 at 12:52 pm
RE: In UK atheists considred more moral than theists. - by Drich - September 10, 2018 at 11:37 am
RE: In UK atheists considred more moral than theists. - by Drich - September 14, 2018 at 10:59 am
RE: In UK atheists considred more moral than theists. - by Drich - September 10, 2018 at 11:47 am
RE: In UK atheists considred more moral than theists. - by Drich - September 11, 2018 at 11:47 am

Possibly Related Threads...
Thread Author Replies Views Last Post
  Moral Law LinuxGal 7 2411 November 8, 2023 at 8:15 am
Last Post: The Grand Nudger
  Question to theists: When to take the bible literally? T.J. 22 5850 November 26, 2021 at 6:14 pm
Last Post: onlinebiker
Thumbs Down The story of Noah' s Ark - or - God is dumber than you. onlinebiker 75 20242 September 24, 2021 at 5:53 pm
Last Post: BrianSoddingBoru4
  How do theists justify the translations of the scriptures? Macoleco 44 14847 October 16, 2019 at 1:25 pm
Last Post: Rev. Rye
  Question to Theists? kartronic 10 4179 May 30, 2019 at 9:11 pm
Last Post: Jehanne
  German Catholic Priests Abused More Than 3,600 Kids Fake Messiah 17 5437 September 14, 2018 at 5:43 pm
Last Post: Gawdzilla Sama
  The believer seems to know god better than he knows himself Paraselene 43 17953 June 2, 2018 at 1:30 pm
Last Post: Angrboda
  Those Theists Willie23 50 13334 May 21, 2018 at 2:23 pm
Last Post: The Grand Nudger
  Theists - I want to know what you think LadyForCamus 77 25632 May 14, 2018 at 4:09 pm
Last Post: Edwardo Piet
Sad My mother believes in Jesus more than in me suffering23 56 18036 April 16, 2018 at 3:11 am
Last Post: ignoramus



Users browsing this thread: 2 Guest(s)