(September 1, 2018 at 5:28 pm)possibletarian Wrote:(September 1, 2018 at 5:10 pm)PRJA93 Wrote: I also agree that it looks inappropriate. But it’s not your place to tell a woman she’s a victim or not a victim. That’s her decision and her experience.
Let me repeat so you can get it through your head, this situation seems very wrong to me, from my point of view. But that’s all I can comment on is my point of view.
So like I said, I will reserve a final answer judgement on this particular situation until Grande speaks on it herself, as the woman who was actually going through this.
Personally I would never touch a woman like this unless I knew for sure she was comfortable with it. And even then I wouldn’t hold a woman like that on national television.
Where did you get this victim rule ? I've never heard anything as silly.
Either it was inappropriate, or it was not. It is inappropriate to hold a women you clearly don't know in such a way that you fingers are constantly rubbing against her breast as she moves away from you, Whether or not it's on national TV or not is irrelevant.
Some women choose not to call themselves victims in situations like this. Maybe she doesn’t feel it was inappropriate. In that case you’re choosing to define for another adult what touching is and isn’t inappropriate.
Once again, I feel it was inappropriate. So do many others, obviously. But it’s not really my place to decide.
That’s sort of like if an incident happened at a party where a girl felt she was sexually assaulted. Can you be the one to decide she wasn’t? I mean, unless it’s a flat out fabrication, a girl saying she was sexually assaulted means it happened. You can’t decide that for another human being.
You are expressing YOUR view but you can’t express the views of others for them.
If you're frightened of dying, and you're holding on, you'll see devils tearing your life away. But if you've made your peace, then the devils are really angels, freeing you from the Earth.
