(September 20, 2011 at 7:54 am)ElDinero Wrote: Oh dear, oh dear. You've used a clip from the utterly discredited, libellous propaganda movie Expelled to make any kind of point whatsoever. Dawkins did not say anything of the sort - did you watch the clip? Ben Stein asked him for any way in which intelligence could have led to life on this planet. The point he is making is a hypothetical way in which intelligence could have designed life and seeded onto Earth. He does not believe that is what happened or that there must be some kind of intelligence, you moron.Yes, as he cannot explain how it happened in the first place and thus proposed a really, really ridiculous alternative. He implicated some form of intelligence - hence the rather absurd alternative. The reason being that intelligence seem to be involved.
Of course I can back up the statement that there is insufficient evidence to believe in God. Don't be so fucking absurd.
There has been no, but no, even experimental success to support the theory that life started by itself from non-living material. Hypotheses have been formulated, but no success creating a living, even less a self-replicating living organism and even less that replication from such an organism actually took place. Even a cursory examination of available information will reveal that to an honest student. So it must rely on a chance that is so small that it would be less than one in the total number of particles in the universe. But that is what is called "science" for you!
I will be happy to receive conclusive proof that there is insufficient reason to believe that God exists. You cannot.
Your rather foul language actually does not support the notion that atheists may be kind and generous beings. So, I was possibly wrong in my assumption in this respect.
I do not mean to be disrespectful, but let us be cordial in discussion. Anger suggests you are losing it.