(September 21, 2018 at 12:56 pm)SteveII Wrote:(September 21, 2018 at 12:31 pm)Jörmungandr Wrote: As pointed out previously, the term "greatest possible being" doesn't have any objective definition, so arguing that God possesses moral perfection on that account is simply an incoherent claim. If you want to claim that God is morally perfect just because you say so, well, fine. I'll simply laugh in rebuttal.
And I'm sure I have pointed out to you that it is not necessary for us to be able to know what it means to be the "greatest possible being". I don't need a definition for that conception of God to be true just as I don't need to know all the natural numbers to understand the concept of infinity.
I’m not sure why anyone should be impressed that you have to resort to a bad analogy to explain your own lack of understanding of a concept you have asserted in the absence of good evidence. *shrug* But that’s about par for the course whenever the ontological argument creeps out of its crypt.
