RE: Peterson's 12 Rules for Life v2.0-- actual book discussion
September 25, 2018 at 10:26 pm
(This post was last modified: September 25, 2018 at 10:27 pm by robvalue.)
(September 25, 2018 at 10:16 pm)Rev. Rye Wrote: To be fair, at first glance, enforced monogamy seems to be a decent hypothesis. Unfortunately, when you look into it, it falls apart like a gold leaf being touched by anything more substantive than the static electricity of a squirrel hair brush.
He later reveals that what he meant by "enforced manogamy" is "our society encouraging manogamy", and that people have misunderstood him. It's pretty clear to me he was deliberately trying to be misunderstood to generate outrage, so that he could then back pedal to a more reasonable stance and play the victim. For a man who apparently chooses his words well, those are some awfully loaded ones. He's playing both sides as usual.
Feel free to send me a private message.
Please visit my website here! It's got lots of information about atheism/theism and support for new atheists.
Index of useful threads and discussions
Index of my best videos
Quickstart guide to the forum
Please visit my website here! It's got lots of information about atheism/theism and support for new atheists.
Index of useful threads and discussions
Index of my best videos
Quickstart guide to the forum