RE: Peterson's 12 Rules for Life v2.0-- actual book discussion
September 26, 2018 at 5:52 am
(This post was last modified: September 26, 2018 at 6:10 am by robvalue.)
Yeah, all I found for that definition is stuff about JP, not any established terms. He wrote that piece after he announced this new terminology, without any of the explanation, in a previous interview. He should have known as well as anyone what bad choices of words they were; or else it was deliberate. You don't just throw something as mental sounding as that out there without explaining it and expect people to read your mind. Why the interviewer didn't ask at the time, I don't know.
Again, if it actually is a real term, then I withdraw my objection.
PS: it's possible of course he was just lying about what he actually meant. We'll never know.
Ok, I'm going to have to stop talking about JP from now on. Thanks all for the discussion! I'm done with this guy.
Again, if it actually is a real term, then I withdraw my objection.
PS: it's possible of course he was just lying about what he actually meant. We'll never know.
Ok, I'm going to have to stop talking about JP from now on. Thanks all for the discussion! I'm done with this guy.
Feel free to send me a private message.
Please visit my website here! It's got lots of information about atheism/theism and support for new atheists.
Index of useful threads and discussions
Index of my best videos
Quickstart guide to the forum
Please visit my website here! It's got lots of information about atheism/theism and support for new atheists.
Index of useful threads and discussions
Index of my best videos
Quickstart guide to the forum