Jesus' Crucifixion a parable

[Drich]

The above must be what a small mind in like on the inside... 
uga, bunga science describe everything I can see feel taste touche.
uga bunga.. science know everthing.
Uga, bunga... me can not feel taste touche God.. Science can no feel taste touche God Science say no God.. uga bunga me say no god...

Ahem.. excuse me uga booga was it, common sense here, sorry don't think we've met before..

Let me get this straight.. your 'science' is a system that classifies tangible items and some intangible items that are based on tangiblee things.. God however is not one of those things so according to science God can not exist in a tangible universe.

ok hang in there uga... but what if... God says this about himself? What if God says I will intentionally be outside of what you will ever be able to see, feel taste or touche? BUT you can know I am here because I will show u when you A+B+C.

Do you see the problem uga?

If God.. is as powerful as He says He is, and then declares He will remain unseen unless you ABC... Then if he says who he says he is... you won't be able to find him. So if Science could find God then God would not be as powerful therefore not God. Do you get it? If science ever could find God then by definition whatever science found can't be God. Meaning if the God of the bible could be put in a 'science box' then by defination what was found can't be God. It's 'scintific paradox!'

So uga bunga Science... is a bullshit excuse, for people who want to pretend they are looking for God, but truly are only intentionally looking in the one place God will not be found.. 

Rather if God is what He says He is then the only way to proof god... is to meet Him on His terms.

Guess what uga... million upon billions of people over thousands of ears have done this very thing. but not 'science' do you still wonder why captain cave man or can you see the paradox?

Incorrect.  Science doesn't know everything.  It knows its limits, but it doesn't make up imaginary answers like "god" to support and comfort itself as religion does.

If anything, religion makes the claim of complete knowledge that can only be understood through "god" via the bible.  

Guess what, that's not knowledge.

That's reliance upon a fictional character based on a fictional book.\

*gasps*

"that's not knowledge" Moron! you are still trying to classify God with a method that would be paradoxical. 

Did you not understand what is being said???

Let's say God is real.. I'm saying science can't literally, can't classify God due to it's restrictions and limitations with in itself. If it could that would mean God would have to fit in the 'box'/parameters of science/God would have to be subject or manipulated by man, in order to be studied and classified, with in the finite world of science. Now if God were finite and science could grasp what was there, then that being is not or ceases to be God.

Do you see the paradox?

So why look for something in a fashion that is by nature paradoxical? Why not remove the paradox then look?

If God is who He says He is... then wouldn't you only be able to find Him the way He demands you look?

---

and that's how we know you are a spoiled no life experience hack try to be little someone who had been around the bend.. the catalyst/ what causes the suffering is meaningless. level of cancer has no correlation between suffering a positive attitude. I know kids with or who had cancer and beside the physical side effects you'd never know they had it. on the other hand I know people with undiagnosed lumps and it is the end of their world already.

We?  You suffer from multiple personality disorder?

Yep, MPD.

you do know you and I are not the only two people on this web site right? We refers to me and every other reader not you.