Evil Atheists

[Carnavon]

Evolution is fact, natural selection is theory (one of the best supported theories we have actually). Evolution does not have anything to do with abiogenesis. A hoax is a hoax, and how do we know it's a hoax? Oh yeah, that's right, outed by other scientists, who spend a significant chunk of their time (some do nothing else) criticizing each others ideas. Were this the only find supporting natural selection we'd be in trouble, unfortunately for you it isn't even a drop in the bucket. How we slipped porn and racism into a rant against science I have no idea, but kudos anyway. No one does christianity a greater disservice than those who would make themselves (and other believers by association) look like complete idiots arguing against a demonstrable fact.

Evolution is change, it's that simple. When we take a look at the fossil record we find that life, on this planet, has gone through some serious reworking in the last few billion years. These fossils are separated by time (and don't even start on your dating bullshit because it's garbage), and geography. Genetic sequencing sealed the deal. There's really nothing to argue against here. Life evolves. The only area for disagreement is the mechanism. Natural selection is a well supported theory for this mechanism (as are a few others).

Now, if you have an axe to grind, it's really easy. Buy a shovel, and start digging a hole. Stop discrediting your own faith by fighting windmills.
http://www.homedepot.com/webapp/wcs/stor...reNum=2807
There you go. $9.97 (plus s/h) and you have every tool you need to support your position. Don't be cheap, do it for God.

(all of "god's conclusions" are merely projections of your own, your demi-god narrative is just a narrative)

Hi, I have no axe to grind I just explain my convictions, as you do. Micro evolution is true, within species and within certain parameters and apparently vaccilates. Life evolves? Yes? Please refer me to intermediate species (not drawings and fakes). And how did life start from inanimate material? You will know that non-directional changes is implied in evolution. Then how come the eye, lungs etc develope? Why?
Maybe an answer to some of the following will also be interesting:
How and why did Single-celled animals evolve (very complex creatures)?
How did it all start -the very beginning?
Natural selection results in changes to different species. If the first single cell organism were reproduceds somehow (please explain to me why the possibility for reproduction need to have been present), why would it change to something else? Why would the need exist? I would like some light on the subject as you seem quite convinced of your position.

---

This is a bit unfair now. Carnavon must love getting fucked in the ass because at the moment me, Rhythm, Epimethean and Zen Badger have him over a barrel.

Your language tells a story, as does your assessment of the facts of the discussion.