RE: 3 simple points to end the discussion with any atheist
September 29, 2018 at 3:33 pm
(This post was last modified: September 29, 2018 at 3:34 pm by Mystic.)
1. This is true but you have to show it's irreducible complex and that blind processes could not lead to design. I do believe consciousness and universe and many biological things are irreducible complex, but your argument is more on the lines appears very designed because of how complex it is but that proves nothing. The thing is it takes science to the level that all possible types of a system must be accounted for to show irreducible complexity design, you have to account for all types and all possible proto-types. That is to say it's not sufficient to use for example on type of consciousness to show it's binary or irreducibly complex, you have to have knowledge enough of all types including those that do not exist or produce an argument that shows there is great distinction between non-consciousness and concsciousness. The same is true of any irreducible complex. Because somethings appear to be designed like the eye, but you can explain it with continuous changes from simple to that, starting with a very simple sensing thing in the ocean, and all these small steps still exist in nature.
2. Again you have to show irreducible complexity with time and universe and sun and moon and humans biological which you have not.
3. It's a very good question, and only leads to God, but you have not shown how.
2. Again you have to show irreducible complexity with time and universe and sun and moon and humans biological which you have not.
3. It's a very good question, and only leads to God, but you have not shown how.