Jesus' Crucifixion a parable

[Drich]

That is not necessarily true, at least according to the Bible. Mark 2:15 (KJV) says  "And it came to pass, that, as Jesus sat at meat in his house, many publicans and sinners sat also together with Jesus and his disciples: for there were many, and they followed him." Now, some apologists have tried to allege the home is owned by Levi, but one need only read the comment in context to see that this defense won't stand the light of scrutiny.
Jesus didn't seem to thik he had any place to live:
MAt 8:20 Jesus said to him, “The foxes have holes to live in. The birds have nests. But the Son of Man has no place to rest.”
and again this is mirrored in luke 9

[quote='Drich' pid='1821028' dateline='1538066871']
Sure. Many, many people go batshit crazy when they lose their kids to diseases and that causes them to start believing in flat earth, spiritualism, Jesus, creationism, Sai Baba - you name it - and you seem pretty insane so maybe it was after one of these incidents that your child died out of cancer and maybe you are just retarded - I don't really know.

Children don't have to die in order for you to lose one. some prodigals simply leave and never return.

There you go, you admit that biological evolution is true and that humans are apes because you say science can't detect god, meaning that everything around us is explained by scientific method which is telling us that everything came by natural causes and there is nothing in beginning of life and humans that we could point and say it was god.

duh... unga bunga = captain cave man = evolution.. Evolution is the pinticle monkey man reasoning for himself based on his senses. which is funny because the monkey think the universe is limited to his 5 senses.
and btw I've been able to assimilate the whole of evolution into a 7 day creation for a very long time now.

And that we also never found any traces of anything in the Bible really happening because that would be proof of god.

over exaggerated.
The bible reads as accurately and in many cases more so as any other jewish text or 1st century text as there are more manuscripts to back up what has been recorded.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Historicity_of_the_Bible

So if Science could find God then God would not be as powerful therefore not God.

Sure, that is correct for people like Christians who believe that god is an unexplainable magic, so if someone was to explain that magic they would "kill" god. But then again god is not a defined thing. Because on the other hand we have "god" like emperor of Japan who is very detectable.

God's does not have to be magic just not contained. see monkeys need to put thinks in boxes and poke it with several series of sticks so then can accuratly predict what happens when they poke it with a sharp stick verses a soft stick. Your problem using monkey logic... God is not going to subject himself to the get in the box so we can poke you with a stick routine.

But since that is the only way monkies can think (in the box) they are lost to a great number of things that will not fit in their little box.