(October 3, 2018 at 5:39 pm)polymath257 Wrote:(October 3, 2018 at 5:34 pm)RoadRunner79 Wrote: No I don’t. I may not be perfect, but I think that we both know and behave as if there is a real right and wrong; good and evil.
I’m not saying that objective morals are inaccessible to non believers. In fact, the moral argument relies on this. It seems that it is your fellow non believers, who argue that there is not a an objective morality, outside of the individual. It’s all based on feelings or something.
And I'm saying that believers are *less* likely to have good morals. Their superstitions get in the way of morality.
Witness all the current debates about gays being given basic rights.
And you have no basis other than what... your own opinion for that? If morality is subjectiv, then you don’t really have an argument or basis for comparison.
Also, I don’t see hardly anyone saying that same sex attracted people should be denied basic human rights. Which you also can’t really argue with subjective morality. As I said, that most people have an inane sense of objective morality, makes me believe it’s true. In fact it’s difficult not to behave as if morals are objective.
It is said that an argument is what convinces reasonable men and a proof is what it takes to convince even an unreasonable man. - Alexander Vilenkin
If I am shown my error, I will be the first to throw my books into the fire. - Martin Luther
If I am shown my error, I will be the first to throw my books into the fire. - Martin Luther