(October 5, 2018 at 12:26 pm)Grandizer Wrote:(October 5, 2018 at 12:19 pm)RoadRunner79 Wrote: What’s funny about this, is that I gave you the reasoning and principle that answered you question, and yet you claim I dodged the question.
Then I asked you a followup question for elaboration, which you refuse to answer. And you have a history of dodging challenging questions over and over again. When I say you're a master at dodging, I'm not talking just this thread.
If you have a challenging question that is on topic, I would suggest that you test out your theory on that. We where currently discussing if morality is objective. I try not to avoid challenging questions, but I do discriminate against questions that bounce around and are meant as little more than a red herring to distort the discussion. You guys seem to have a habit of changing the topic, when confronted with challenging questions, rather than a systematic thoughtful dialog. You then claim that people are dodging. When your responses are not related to something I said, but are about something else, then they tend to get ignored (just not for the reason that you imagine).
It is said that an argument is what convinces reasonable men and a proof is what it takes to convince even an unreasonable man. - Alexander Vilenkin
If I am shown my error, I will be the first to throw my books into the fire. - Martin Luther
If I am shown my error, I will be the first to throw my books into the fire. - Martin Luther