RE: How Can We Have Moral Direction If God Controls Everything?
October 12, 2018 at 11:38 am
(This post was last modified: October 12, 2018 at 11:39 am by GrandizerII.)
(October 12, 2018 at 11:34 am)HappySkeptic Wrote: I'm happy to talk physics
Quantum Mechanical interpretations is an interest of mine, and I have used a few of them in my work. To me, they each can be useful, as long as you don't take them too seriously. Copenhagen is the first one that students are usually taught, as it is easiest. It is also the least useful, because it promotes the fallacy of instantaneous collapse, when the reality is a complex network of superposition with the environment, leading to decoherence.
Quantum Mechanics has a collapse problem. There is no way around it. There is no model for collapse in the theory. It is simply assumed, and something like collapse must occur at some point, or we would not have a single macroscopic history of reality. We just don't know how or why.
What do you think of Hugh Everett's Many-Worlds Interpretation?
