It's not what I believe but what I know by thorough, exhausive and pretty irrefutable study of the text. The text actually says that God ordered the cosmos and finished with himself at the centre (The model of a temple): a foundation laying out function.
Not that a day might refer to a metaphorical time span that would align to scientific data, but that physical evolution is not the subject at all.
The resurrection could never be proven, or it would cease to be a metaphysical proposition, and instead become an anomoly to be explained by natural scientific method.
Not that a day might refer to a metaphorical time span that would align to scientific data, but that physical evolution is not the subject at all.
The resurrection could never be proven, or it would cease to be a metaphysical proposition, and instead become an anomoly to be explained by natural scientific method.
