Answers in Genesis (website)

[superstarr]

http://www.answersingenesis.org/articles...d-is-earth

This article may be a bit old, but creationists still do some of these things, and still believe that they are fact. What do you guys think?

One thing that never stops amusing me, is how those creationists interpret the bible literally, like how they include Adam and Eve as the first humans on Earth and still "think" they know that it's true, even when there's evidence on human existance that extends back about 27000 years.

[Minimalist]

The dumbest bunch of mother-fuckers on the planet.

[Watson]

It actually took me a moment to figure out what the fuck they were talking about...and it still didn't make any sense once I did.

[Loki_999]

Some used the Septuagint or another early translation, instead of the Hebrew Masoretic text. The Septuagint is a Greek translation of the Hebrew Old Testament, done about 250 B.C. by about 70 Jewish scholars (hence it is often cited as the LXX). It is good in most places, but appears to have a number of inaccuracies. For example, one relates to the Genesis chronologies where the LXX indicates that Methuselah would have lived past the Flood, without being on the Ark!

I really like the exclamation mark at the end of the paragraph. Kind of saying "how absurd"... but the whole damn thing is absurd.

To be honest I think the people at the top of AiG know its all a load of crap and they are just happily raking in the money from the gullible who actually swallow all this tripe. A majority of the claims made are complete horse shit and many have been repeatedly proven to be shit.