I was just using that as an example. If any part of the Bible gets disproved, does that change what a correct reading entails?
I honestly do not understand this. So now we're into a regression. What is the author of this book using to interpret the Bible in this way? What does he point to besides the Bible to explain the correct way to read the Bible? It appears to me that the Bible is being retrofitted to catch up with contemporary science. Why did nobody a thousand years ago interpret the Bible this way?
I honestly do not understand this. So now we're into a regression. What is the author of this book using to interpret the Bible in this way? What does he point to besides the Bible to explain the correct way to read the Bible? It appears to me that the Bible is being retrofitted to catch up with contemporary science. Why did nobody a thousand years ago interpret the Bible this way?