(October 16, 2018 at 1:40 pm)Joods Wrote:(October 16, 2018 at 12:50 pm)onlinebiker Wrote: I disagree.
Selecting who answered isn't the only way to pick cherries.
Selecting which questions you ask - or neglect to ask works just as well.
Are you dense? This is what you asked:
Quote:Would they now switch their vote to Hillary??
And this is what I answered with:
Quote:Actually, according to at least one or two of them, they plan on voting straight democratic ticket in November. So even if this was a presidential election year and Hillary was the democratic nominee, she would get their vote.
I fail to see how that's not answering your question. I watched the interview. I paid attention. Unless you're asking me to go back in time armed with the knowledge I have now, and for them to do the same, would they vote for her? You need to specify that otherwise you're asking me to make a prediction about a past tense event and I can't do that. Furthermore, I think that common sense should give you the answer to that.
You need insults?
That' s always a poor backstop for rational debate.
...
Again - the questions you ask can change the outcome of any polling --
If a person states " I'm voting straight ticket" - in response to query, the response could be changed if you specify who is running.
But, if you like the answer - you quit questioning.
Cherry picked.
