RE: Shutting down fossil fuel electric plants
October 21, 2018 at 12:19 pm
(This post was last modified: October 21, 2018 at 12:24 pm by Amarok.)
(October 21, 2018 at 10:25 am)Anomalocaris Wrote:Yes it is all or nothing(October 21, 2018 at 10:04 am)Tizheruk Wrote: But were going to have to do it or suffer the consequences
It’s not an all or nothing thing.
(October 21, 2018 at 10:11 am)wyzas Wrote: More nuclear generated electricity will need to be in the mix somewhere. Never said it was the total answer.
The problem with nuclear is unless the capital cost is greatly reduced, it is not economic on all-in cost of energy basis. Particularly in the US. Right now Solar, wind and fossil are all cheaper than nuclear. This is discouraging the sort of investment needed to provide good prospect of improvement. Trump restricting nuclear exports to China is not helping with nuclear power research in the US.
(October 21, 2018 at 11:40 am)wyzas Wrote:(October 21, 2018 at 10:45 am)Anomalocaris Wrote: If you can’t convince the rate payers to subsidize the higher cost, then the cost is the ultimate issue.
It so happens that, on the whole, those willing to pay extra to reduce green house gas emission also loath nuclear power with even more vehement passion. So nuclear power is the evidence solution to the problem that is hated by those most concerned with the problem even more than the problem itself.
Then those people will need to grow up.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Economics_...er_sources
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Passive_nu..._operation
![[Image: hqdefault.jpg]](https://i.ytimg.com/vi/zwk_53DEp44/hqdefault.jpg)
Tell that to the people who lived in Fukushima Daiichi
Seek strength, not to be greater than my brother, but to fight my greatest enemy -- myself.
Inuit Proverb
Inuit Proverb


