RE: Shutting down fossil fuel electric plants
October 21, 2018 at 3:02 pm
(This post was last modified: October 21, 2018 at 3:11 pm by brewer.)
(October 21, 2018 at 1:44 pm)Tizheruk Wrote:(October 21, 2018 at 12:31 pm)wyzas Wrote: Comes down to what do you/they fear more, potential global catastrophe or potential localized catastrophe.It was far from just local as contamination has entered the Pacific ecosystem
causing damage well beyond Japan. And an increase in plant numbers just makes that more likely .
Did it effect the entire planet? Did Chernobyl? Did the hundreds (500+) of bombs?
Let me put it another way, which is the planet (and the human race) more likely to recover from?
To my way of thinking we're going to have to pick. The fear of limited electric power is the greatest fear and a non option. Or maybe global warming isn't the treat I've been lead to believe.
Read about the passive safety developments where Japan would not happen again. There is also micro reactors to take into consideration.
(October 21, 2018 at 2:06 pm)Anomalocaris Wrote: I would not be. I do long-term energy market forecast for living. I work with Los Alamo national laboratory On economic assessment of emergent nuclear technology for utility resource planning purposes.
Then you're just the person to ask, more nuclear reactors replacing fossil fuel reactors (as many as possible understand peak demand issues) or not?
Being told you're delusional does not necessarily mean you're mental.