(December 5, 2018 at 1:48 pm)Drich Wrote: https://www.blueletterbible.org/lang/Lex...2264&t=KJV
try this one
then you have this one showing where I got the text/passage or word from it's orginal context
https://www.blueletterbible.org/kjv/luk/...onc_974005
If verse 5 is not open click on it and then again on herod's name open in interlinear. and it should bring you to the actual definition.
-or- Goto blueletterbible.org
in the top center header search bar type Luke 1 then click search
Then scroll down to chapter 1 verse 5 and click on it and it should open in interlinear automatically then click on the english word herod. that shows you every single use of the word that holds the same or common definition..ifyou will note this version of herod is used when ever speaking of the king of judea at the time of Christ's birth. Also note this is not herod the great by clicking on G2264 (Ever word in the bible is in this lexicon and each word has a number) this use or defination of this word is G2264 and it will give you the intended definition or meaning of this word
Thank you for wasting my time. Your top link only proves my case that Luke called Antipas "the tetrarch" and "Herod King of Judea" was a reference to Herod the Great. Bold emphasis mine:
Quote:Herod surnamed "Antipas", was the son of Herod the Great and Malthace, a Samaritan woman. After the death of his father he was appointed by the Romans tetrarch of Galilee and Peraea. His first wife was the daughter of Aretas, king of Arabia; but he subsequently repudiated her and took to himself Herodias, the wife of his brother Herod Philip; and in consequence Aretas, his father-in-law, made war against him and conquered him. He cast John the Baptist into prison because John had rebuked him for this unlawful connection; and afterwards, at the instigation of Herodias, he ordered him to be beheaded. Induced by her, too, he went to Rome to obtain from the emperor the title of king. But in consequence of the accusations brought against him by Herod Agrippa I, Caligula banished him (A.D. 39) to Lugdunum in Gaul, where he seems to have died. He was light minded, sensual and vicious.
He was neither "king" nor did he rule all of Judea. Further, I've provided you with textural evidence that Luke specifically referred to Antipas as "the tetrarch" (Luke 9:7) and it would have been an inconsistency for him to have earlier called him "king of Judea".
"It's all there, black and white, clear as crystal. ...You lose. Good day, sir."
Atheist Forums Hall of Shame:
"The trinity can be equated to having your cake and eating it too."
... -Lucent, trying to defend the Trinity concept
"(Yahweh's) actions are good because (Yahweh) is the ultimate standard of goodness. That’s not begging the question"
... -Statler Waldorf, Christian apologist
"The trinity can be equated to having your cake and eating it too."
... -Lucent, trying to defend the Trinity concept
"(Yahweh's) actions are good because (Yahweh) is the ultimate standard of goodness. That’s not begging the question"
... -Statler Waldorf, Christian apologist
