C'mon, Look At All This Stuff That's Real

[Drich]

Thank you for wasting my time. Your top link only proves my case that Luke called Antipas "the tetrarch" and "Herod King of Judea" was a reference to Herod the Great. Bold emphasis mine:

Herod surnamed "Antipas", was the son of Herod the Great and Malthace, a Samaritan woman. After the death of his father he was appointed by the Romans tetrarch of Galilee and Peraea. His first wife was the daughter of Aretas, king of Arabia; but he subsequently repudiated her and took to himself Herodias, the wife of his brother Herod Philip; and in consequence Aretas, his father-in-law, made war against him and conquered him. He cast John the Baptist into prison because John had rebuked him for this unlawful connection; and afterwards, at the instigation of Herodias, he ordered him to be beheaded. Induced by her, too, he went to Rome to obtain from the emperor the title of king. But in consequence of the accusations brought against him by Herod Agrippa I, Caligula banished him (A.D. 39) to Lugdunum in Gaul, where he seems to have died. He was light minded, sensual and vicious.

He was neither "king" nor did he rule all of Judea. Further, I've provided you with textural evidence that Luke specifically referred to Antipas as "the tetrarch" (Luke 9:7) and it would have been an inconsistency for him to have earlier called him "king of Judea". 

"It's all there, black and white, clear as crystal. ...You lose. Good day, sir." 

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=M5QGkOGZubQ

I'm gonna give you the benfit of the doubt.. you are proud and stupid.. you probably never used a lexicon before so let me walk it though AGAIN because you seem to have missed the proof before...

click on the link:
https://www.blueletterbible.org/lang/lex...2264&t=KJV

4th box down you will see this:
KJV Translation Count — Total: 44x

The KJV translates Strong's G2264 in the following manner: Herod, Antipas (27x), Herod, the Great (11x), Herod Agrippa (6x).

now click on herod, antipas (27x)

what this is is that the lexicon is saying out of the whole bible the word herod in context has been translated refering to antipas 27 different times.. Now when you click on this it will give you each and every verse that has antipas as it's intended translation... Now douche bag click on it and seek if Luke 1 is in that list...

Oh wait a tick it is on the list of Antipas translations!











You would have already known this if you just listen the first time!

---

Thank you for wasting my time. Your top link only proves my case that Luke called Antipas "the tetrarch" and "Herod King of Judea" was a reference to Herod the Great. Bold emphasis mine:



He was neither "king" nor did he rule all of Judea. Further, I've provided you with textural evidence that Luke specifically referred to Antipas as "the tetrarch" (Luke 9:7) and it would have been an inconsistency for him to have earlier called him "king of Judea". 

"It's all there, black and white, clear as crystal. ...You lose. Good day, sir." 

Told you

you should at least wait to see what the guy with 25 years of translating biblical texts has to say before you jump on a broken argument, you might just learn something WITHOUT being stigmatized as being a moron yes man or a johnny come lately.