(December 5, 2018 at 5:03 pm)Drich Wrote: paid or poor I'm 100% right here and in the other thread when it came down to a basic use of the lexicon.
No, you're not. You lost that exchange.
Your interpretation that Luke's reference to "Herod, king of Judea" must be about Herod Antipas is, at best, a stubborn, unfounded assumption defended against the textural evidence to the contrary and it's every bit as strange as your interpretation that the word "God" (big G, proper name "God") is a title and not a being. I'll be kind and call your beliefs "heterodox".
YahwehIsTheWay would call you a "dumbass phony Christian" but he's a bit more rude than I am.
Atheist Forums Hall of Shame:
"The trinity can be equated to having your cake and eating it too."
... -Lucent, trying to defend the Trinity concept
"(Yahweh's) actions are good because (Yahweh) is the ultimate standard of goodness. That’s not begging the question"
... -Statler Waldorf, Christian apologist
"The trinity can be equated to having your cake and eating it too."
... -Lucent, trying to defend the Trinity concept
"(Yahweh's) actions are good because (Yahweh) is the ultimate standard of goodness. That’s not begging the question"
... -Statler Waldorf, Christian apologist