C'mon, Look At All This Stuff That's Real

[Drich]

when where?

---

last we spoke as on luke 1 ands the use or identification of herod antipas and I showed you or told you to click on the translation count specifically "Antipas"

looks like this:KJV Translation Count — Total: 44x
The KJV translates Strong's G2264 in the following manner: Herod, Antipas (27x), Herod, the Great (11x), Herod Agrippa (6x).

This will give you each verse that was translated antipas Luke one is included in that 27 times!!!

This is what happens when you click on the links for "Antipas" on your source

https://www.blueletterbible.org/search/s...rimary_0_1

Luke 3:1 ...
Luke 3:19 ...
Luke 9:7 ...
Luke 13:31 ...
Luke 23:7 ...

...but NO reference to Luke Chapter 1 verse 5.  

Furthermore, every single reference to Antipas that your source quotes specifies "Antipas" and thrice refers to him as ruler of "Galilee" NOT over Judea. This dovetails with my textural evidence to support my claim. 

My source, Oxford University, confirms the mainstream interpretation that Luke 1:5 is referring to Herod the Great. 

On the other hand, when you follow your link to see the references to Herod, the Great, look what comes up:

Luke 1:5 There was in the days of Herod,  the king of Judaea, a certain priest named Zacharias, of the course of Abia: and his wife was of the daughters of Aaron, and her name was Elisabeth.

You lose, sir. Good day, sir.

Dear Dummy:

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Herod_Antipas

Herod Antipas
Tetrarch of Galilee and Perea

Coin of Herod Antipas
Reign
c. 4 BC/AD 1 – 39
Predecessor
Herod the Great
Successor
Agrippa I
Born
Before 20 BC
Died
After AD 39
Gaul
Wives

• Phasaelis, Daughter of Aretas IV
  
• Herodias
  

[size=undefined]
Dynasty
Herodian Dynasty
Father
Herod the Great
Mother
Malthace[/size]
Herod Antipater (Greek: Ἡρῴδης Ἀντίπατρος, Hērǭdēs Antipatros; born before 20 BC – died after 39 AD), known by the nickname who bore the title of tetrarch ("ruler of a quarter") and is referred to as both "Herod the Tetrarch"[1] and "King Herod"[2] in the New Testament although he never held the title of king.[3] He is widely known today for accounts in the New Testament of his role in events that led to the executions of John the Baptist and Jesus of Nazareth.
After being recognized by Augustus upon the death of his father, Herod the Great (c. 4 BC/AD 1), and subsequent ethnarch rule by his brother, Herod Archelaus, Antipas officially ruled Galilee and Perea as a client state of the Roman Empire.[4][5] He was responsible for building projects at Sepphoris and Betharamphtha, and more important for the construction of his capital Tiberias on the western shore of the Sea of Galilee. Named in honor of his patron, the emperor Tiberius, the city later became a center of rabbinic learning.

which was the region Jesus was born in.. IE Luke 1

---

Are you stupid or something?
or is it your hope I don't know how to use my own point of reference???

works for me!!!! cut and pasted:

I figured out what your problem is. You're clicking on the links to "Herod" and getting ALL references to that name, including both Antipas and Herod the Great, aren't you? 

EDIT TO ADD: I'll go slow. When you click on that link to "Herod", you get Matt 2:1, 2:3, 2:7, 2:12, 2:13, 2:15, 2:16, 2:19 and 2:22. These are references to the story of the Wise Men and Herod's slaughter of the innocents, which all is a reference to Herod the Great. I hope you're not disputing that this Herod is Herod the Great, which would really put you in dispute with mainstream scholarship, especially since Antipas didn't rule over Jerusalem. 

You can't figure out, even after being corrected all these times, that you made that mistake. 

Sweet Reason, you are a moron. 

OMG... that is what it is.. You don't know how to use this simple point of reference material and rather than ask or show weakness of any kind you rather assume the fault is mine and call me a liar! what a broken 6th grade response this is. Is 6th grade the limit of your intellect? seriously you want me to not know how to use the reference material I supplied so you are just calling me a liar out of thin air, in hopes that I am wrong. That's trolling or at least flaming.


Wow


here's the thing sport I cut and pasted from the reference material and explain your error. go back and read the post you are respnding to. it shows your intentional mistake as well it bears out my explanation!

I show where herod antipas was identified in luke 1 which is simply translated "king herod" in the english. and then I showed you via a wiki page where herod antipas was also known as king herod...

That sport ends the discussion if truth is any concern, the rest is trolling.