C'mon, Look At All This Stuff That's Real

[DeistPaladin]

[quote pid='1866850' dateline='1544547962']

Drich

is invalid for the following reasons:
1) Luke in the greek only used one word ever to originally describe herod and that is Strong's number: g2264 Ἡρῴδης Hērōdēs (the first number being the word number in the Strong's lexicon/every word in the bible has a greek number so as to track how many times it shows up and how it is translated. The same word is used in luke 1 as well as in your reference luke 9:7. Meaning Luke in the koine greek only used one word and that was: word number g2264 In luke 1 we know Antipas is referenced because the translation count part of the referenced website includes G2264 as being counted among the herod antipas translation

2) when the word was translated to english in luke 1 Herod Antipas was used, and when G2264 was translated in luke 9 shows the same greek word g2264 being used, but it was translated Tetrarch why? the above wiki article describes why.. because this man was known to the greeks as the tetrarch and to the jews as herod antipas, so both where used so this passage speaks to a broader audience.

3)but despite that the same exact word was used in luke one as well as luke 9:7
https://www.blueletterbible.org/search/s...rimary_0_1

[/quote]
You are as delusional as you are moronic. You keep clicking on the link to "Herod", which is giving you all the references to BOTH Herod the Great AND Herod Antipas. I've already pointed out your error but I'll go even slower:

Notice on the page you link to how there are eight (8) references to "Herod" in Matthew Chapter 2.  

Look carefully. Even you can't miss it. 

Matthew Chapter 2 details the story of the "wise men" and the "slaughter of the innocents" and Jesus' family's escape to Egypt. You know the story, I assume, so I don't have to cut-and-paste all eight verses where Herod's name is mentioned? 

This story references Herod the Great. 

I'm going to pause to give you time for your addled brain to catch up.  

This story references Herod the Great on the page of references you claim mention only Herod Antipas. 

Now are you going to argue that Matthew Chapter 2 is also talking about Herod Antipas? Then why are they in Jerusalem, a city that Antipas never ruled? 

Jesus was born in galilee moron 

What does that have to do with Herod Antipas not being King of JUDEA? 

Again, I'll go slow.

Antipas... never... ruled... all... of... Judea. 

Therefore... he... was... not... "King of Judea". 

Even... if... he... had... the... title... "king".

Is that point sinking in yet? 

you have yet t post one 1 ONE point of reference. 

New Oxford Annotated Bible, NRSV, Oxford University Press, footnote on Luke 1:5

"In the days of King Herod of Judea" refers broadly to 37-4 BCE.

No mention of any scholarly controversy about this point. Odd, isn't it? It's almost like nobody supports your bullshit account. 

ask one of your peers dummy. 

I think at this point, the only question anyone will have is why I'm wasting time trying to reason with a deluded moron like yourself.