RE: Atheists being asked about the existence of Jesus
January 6, 2019 at 1:17 pm
(This post was last modified: January 6, 2019 at 1:27 pm by Aoi Magi.)
Hmm, did Jesus exist?
Well, by Jesus if you mean Brian, then yes, he did exist and I have video evidence to prove it oh and his story is a lot more believable in that version too.
How about a witness at a trial?
- their testimony is considered, yes, but it cannot be considered conclusive proof. Believers testimonies have been considered too, sadly they don't stand to scrutiny.
Or do you believe anything based on a logical conclusion or a philosophical reason?
- Logic, yes! Philosophy, well, those which I can understand logically, I do consider!
Can science view anything in an abstract manner?
- Ever hear of something called Maths?
How about love and hate?
- they exist and are not exclusive to humans either
Are these just the results of chemical reactions in the brain or a mere physical reaction to a stimulus? Scientism reduces the whole human being and experience down to a chemical level because it can't grasp things like emotions or hope in any way other than a physical testing
- Yes, they are chemical reactions in response to various stimuli. It's not because science can't grasp anything else, rather it's because there has never been any demonstrable alternatives.
Well, by Jesus if you mean Brian, then yes, he did exist and I have video evidence to prove it oh and his story is a lot more believable in that version too.
(January 6, 2019 at 1:16 pm)Lek Wrote:(January 6, 2019 at 9:07 am)unfogged Wrote: What other option provides a reliable method for determining truth?
How about a witness at a trial? Or do you believe anything based on a logical conclusion or a philosophical reason? Can science view anything in an abstract manner? How about love and hate? Are these just the results of chemical reactions in the brain or a mere physical reaction to a stimulus? Scientism reduces the whole human being and experience down to a chemical level because it can't grasp things like emotions or hope in any way other than a physical testing. According to science EVERYTHING we think, feel or do -everything we are- is a physical process. Everything about us is nothing but dirt in action. Sorry bout that. I guess my nonphysical side got carried away for a second.
How about a witness at a trial?
- their testimony is considered, yes, but it cannot be considered conclusive proof. Believers testimonies have been considered too, sadly they don't stand to scrutiny.
Or do you believe anything based on a logical conclusion or a philosophical reason?
- Logic, yes! Philosophy, well, those which I can understand logically, I do consider!
Can science view anything in an abstract manner?
- Ever hear of something called Maths?
How about love and hate?
- they exist and are not exclusive to humans either
Are these just the results of chemical reactions in the brain or a mere physical reaction to a stimulus? Scientism reduces the whole human being and experience down to a chemical level because it can't grasp things like emotions or hope in any way other than a physical testing
- Yes, they are chemical reactions in response to various stimuli. It's not because science can't grasp anything else, rather it's because there has never been any demonstrable alternatives.
Quote:To know yet to think that one does not know is best; Not to know yet to think that one knows will lead to difficulty.
- Lau Tzu
Join me on atheistforums Slack (pester tibs via pm if you need invite)