What do moderates think Jesus died for?

[Bucky Ball]

They're all part of the same package. 


Which just proves that if they need 33,000 sects to encompass their views, then there is no such thing as "Christianity", (or Roman Catholicism for that matter). 

McCabe's view is NOT what the official Roman position is, (which is written in the Catechism of the Roman Catholic Church). He is NOT "representative" of anything. 
He held no official (magisterial) position in the church, (except being a priest). He is not "installed" as an authority on anything, and anyone can see the WIDE difference between him and official Roman stances, on many things.
Type in "Jesus came to save" here : http://ccc.scborromeo.org.master.com/tex...earch&s=SS
He did NOT just come to be "human". The creeds of the RC Church over and over again proclaim his mission and concurrent divinity, (although only one of the gospels does).

BTW, nice try there sport. My educated view of the various positions of the various church bodies in no way rests on being an "atheist",  (which I am not).

It seems you’re one of those who like to argue for arguements sake. The OP asked what do moderates think Jesus died for, I supplied some moderate views.

Regardless of what you think the catholic view is, which I’m doubtful any catholic would agree with.

YOU introduced McCabe, not me. A heretical view in Catholicism. 
Argument is not spelled "arguement".

So you're saying Catholics do not agree with the Roman Catholic Catechism ... LMAO. 
I see you really know nothing of Catholicism. 
You supplied HERETICAL views, perhaps your personal views ??  No Christian says Jesus came merely "to be human". 
If that were true, any of the many other wandering preacher/miracle workers would have sufficed.

Catholics EVERY DAY, including today, say they are literally re-enacting, .. "re-enact" the SACRIFICE (the mass) which Jesus was sent to accomplish.