Quote:(September 29, 2011 at 1:29 pm)Rhythm Wrote: I'd say that attempting to draw a logical or sound conclusion from an illogical and unsound premise is going to be pretty rough work.
Is it not said that men of intelligence can discuss issues that they do not believe in?
Quote: If one were to swallow the koolaid, we'd only be arguing over interpretation and context wouldn't we?
Our choice.
Quote: Which is exactly what we see over and over again. If you wish to maintain that your god is kinder, or somehow more morally upright than anyone elses, in reality, not just as an idea....you'll have to provide evidence for your own god.
This was not supposed to be about my notions of God.
All discussions of God, in terms of existence and fathomable-ness, are speculative at best and nonsense at worst.
Analyzing the morality shown may be fruitful though.
But the God you follow, God as a set of moral rules, also exceed the moral position of the genocidal God. Does it not?
Would you use genocide as a form of justice?
Regards
DL
