Evolution and Christianity and Salvation

[downbeatplumb]

[quote='downbeatplumb' pid='1889196' dateline='1551723892']
You can also use a computer but that doesn't mean you know how it works.

What you have demonstrated by the things you have typed here on every subject you have visited is your lack of knowledge of the scientific process. You misunderstand it at a fundamental level.

And religion has never "had" to hate science, but to be believed it does have to be testable by science and it just isn't. The way people have dealt with the failure of religion to meet the scientific tests is to place god in an unknowable place. The sure sign of a con.

your out of touch with people. you seem to have a very large disconnect between the way people are.. and what your idealism tell you to tell me.

I do not have a preconception. I just do not believe what theists have claimed.

People have been polarized no in betweens when it come to church and science. to the point they make movies about it:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/God%27s_Not_Dead_(film)

This is a film that describes much of the scholastic climate towards people of faith and 'science. where a man of faith is ridiculed and fails his class because he will not deny God, and while you may try and poo poo on the level of personal hate the professor has toward people of faith, this is how a large portion of the world see people of science. something you claim does not exist.

This film is a propaganda that misrepresents both science and education. particularly in one of the most heavily theocratic countries in the world. Remember that in the US it is the atheists who face discrimination from the theists.

And again what God has allowed me to share is a reading of the word that takes this particular conflict out of religion and science.

which at best makes you next comment about my understanding of science a foretelling of your own ignorance. as collecting data to generate an accurate hypothesis is at the core of any scientific endeavor. to which you have made no inquiries, tested me in no way nor even asked me to explain what I do know. you are sterotypically taking old atheist assertion about people of faith and throwing up against the wall to see what sticks. Which makes your assumption is as far from scientific truth as one can be.

Your "collecting data" seems to be all anecdote and nothing that actually consistutes anything even beginning to resemble evidence.

This shows you have failed in everything in your lat post. which means you are beyond stupid or you are so emotionally driven to the point, you should not be speaking to anyone one about anything scientific. as your truth is defined by how you feel and not vetted fact.

I am not emotionally driven as I couldn't give a toss whether atheism is true or theism is true it just so happen that there atheism is the only stance that is possible to a thinking person in the modern world.

show me some effort show me some leg work show me a lattice of logic that brings me to a conclusion you have made as I have stacked evidence against you

As you have never presented anything that counts as evidence you are a bit cheeky in claiming "Stacks of it".

and not just made blid claims about your character. I've shown faultly logic and fault reasoning by the lack of intellectual activity. show me something beside a simpleton calling someone else names because you disagree.

You have not shown my faulty logic, I don't think you know what logic is and as to my lack of intellectual activity I can only assume that my lofty thoughts are just to rarefied for your limited mental capacity to comprehend.

Have I called you names?

I don't remember calling you names, but then these little posts between us are not something I care to retain. I will forget this in a minute.

You do seem to have very limited knowledge on practically every sphere of human learning though, biology, history, science and chemistry your ignorance seems to be unrestrained.