(March 8, 2019 at 11:23 am)Drich Wrote:(March 8, 2019 at 10:51 am)pocaracas Wrote: Screw you, idiot!
you've got to be one of the dumbest people on this web site.
Do you not understand my discussion was not about what you believe, but the fact that there is 500 years of global weathr research that is contary to what is currently believed.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Temperatur...1000_years
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Milankovitch_cycles
Interestingly enough this milankovitch theory also jives with the holy grail of the sky is falling, the precious ice core samples. The only problem? can't make carbon tax work when the sun is naturally putting out more energy or less or the earth's orbit is off this year. can't blame the rich for altering the earths orbit can we?
Again you f-ing retard it is not what you believe but the fact there are very well researched alternatives that fit all of the evidence and yet provide a completely different conclusion/hypothesis!
NOW you belief comes in.. because you are now aware of two equally credible beliefs (one just happens to be hyped by pop culture and the media and the other all but buried because there is no money in it) You are demonstrating faith in believing in pop culture's 30 year old theory that says the world can be saved if we just pay our way out of this problem.
Do you get it? no you don't as you are one of the slowest members here. you still think this is about global warming.. because you don't actually read anything but the first two lines and the last two lines and if they don't make sense you just make up a straw man and attack it!
So... you want to dismiss a warming on the scale of 100 years with a theory that explains cycles on a time scale of several thousands of years?
Here, the important line is the blue one, and notice how the red one isn't going down like in the previous cycles:
Hey, look, practically the same plot as on my previous post, but with an extra source of information: