(March 23, 2019 at 8:20 pm)Brian37 Wrote:You can watch any of a number of true crime shows and find out what can be used as poison, which are hardest to detect, and if it's a one dose thing or an accumulation over time thing.(March 23, 2019 at 7:44 pm)chimp3 Wrote: I see it like this, today's administration denies the voice of the racist. Next administration denies the voice of the secular humanist.
Besides, I want to know who the wackos are.Let them speak.
Not a matter of letting the wackos speak or not speak, it is a matter of not letting someone print instructions on how to build pipe bombs.
Again, there is a huge difference between allowing offensive speech, and the completely separate issue of stopping incitement to violence.
Again, the Nazis are not lacking in representation in the Holocaust Museum. But Mein Kampf was an instruction manual for genocide.
You can still find the Unibomber's manifesto if you want to read it, but it isn't printed en mass as an advertisement for a Caribbean Cruise.
NZ was not trying to silence dissent in this, they were trying to stop more violence. Just like you don't mass copy instructions on how to make poison.
Who decides what is to be censored? What are the guidelines for making that decision?
Your 'facts' tend to be how you think things should be, not how they are.