New Zealand Bans Manifesto

[chimp3]

I think "Everyone should kill you!" is appropriate at times.

Remind me never to elect you to office.

You still don't get it. Hitler deserved to die, and too bad the coward committed suicide, so in that context I get what you are saying.

But again, everything is case by case. And in the context of that manifesto, and that individual, and what he was selling, NZ was not trying to silence dissent, but prevent violence from spreading.

Now again, that manifesto is on record, it isn't going anywhere, but what NZ does not want, like America does not allow today, is "Whites Only" signs in the real world, even if movies depict that horrible past when it was legal.

Do you think the killer's free speech was violated when he did a live feed of his killing spree and FB eventually yanked it?

Do I think the killers free speech was violated? What difference does that make? The right to free press is  given to the owners of presses (media outlets). That fuckwad is being charged with murder not outrageous speech. The press owners have the right to determine what content they will print. This is true of Atheist Forums also.

---

Member jokingly states "So, kill me!"

 Other member jokingly responds "Everyone should kill you!"

 Everyone laughs.

Appropriate.