Sometimes, there simply are no good choices; Only those decisions that cause the least harm.
The government made the right call, IMO.
If it's clear that the manifesto's sole or primary intention was to incite unlawful violence/terrorist acts against NZ's Muslim population, then I believe that access to it should be strictly limited.
I don't regard protecting private citizens' right to gawk at the manifesto as a means of satisfying their morbid curiosity to be MORE important than protecting maligned ethnic groups from potential copycat crimes/mass murder.
The government made the right call, IMO.
If it's clear that the manifesto's sole or primary intention was to incite unlawful violence/terrorist acts against NZ's Muslim population, then I believe that access to it should be strictly limited.
I don't regard protecting private citizens' right to gawk at the manifesto as a means of satisfying their morbid curiosity to be MORE important than protecting maligned ethnic groups from potential copycat crimes/mass murder.
