Why I don't believe in 'free will'

[Darwinian]

There's no evidence of free will. But I believe that there is the equivalent of evidence of my belief. And that equivalent is there is NO evidence OF 'free will'...

No.. Just because there is no evidence for proposition A in no way does it follow that proposition B has gained credibility as a result.

I could say, but I don't, that you have no evidence for your belief in the illusion of free will so therefore and because of that, that I have some sort of evidence in favour of it.

For my belief is not a belief but a dislbelief. When I say "I believe there is no free will" I am IOW saying that I DISbelieve in free will. So I don't need evidence of 'no free will' I need evidence OF free will - since I am not being absolutist.

But you clearly said..

I believe that I know it's now an illusion

This is a statement of belief without evidence. Faith!

fr0d0 tells me that there can be no evidence of God so it's ridiculous to ask for it. And I say that I'm still not going to actually believe without evidence though.

Who understands what fr0d0 says? Not even fr0d0 I suspect. No offence fr0d0