RE: This may be farewell.
April 30, 2019 at 4:56 pm
(This post was last modified: April 30, 2019 at 5:03 pm by BrianSoddingBoru4.)
(April 30, 2019 at 3:50 pm)Brian37 Wrote:(April 30, 2019 at 2:42 pm)BrianSoddingBoru4 Wrote: Prove it. Or provide evidence. Or posit an argument that consists of anything more than just shouting your assertions.
Boru
Prove that America does not exist because of Cherry Trees and not telling lies.
Again, there is no dispute that the crown in Notre Dame exists. WE BOTH AGREE IT DOES.
I dispute it being a first hand relic of the alleged year of 34 where the bible claims he was crucified.
The first mention of that relic came long after the story itself.
That says to me, that humans concocted a stage prop AFTER THE FACT, to market a story they liked way after the first claims of a legend were made.
I'm not asking you to prove that the crown at Notre Dame exists. I'm asking you to demonstrate how you know it was constructed centuries after the fact. The late mention of the Crown means nothing. The Sphinx was built about 2500 BCE but isn't mentioned in any surviving records before about 1400 BCE (and that record is kind of problematic). Does that mean the Sphinx really dates from 1400 BCE?
So, again, what actual evidence or arguments do you have that the Crown is not authentic?
Boru
‘I can’t be having with this.’ - Esmeralda Weatherwax