Fox News’ Father Jonathan Morris is Quitting the Priesthood So He Can Have Sex

[Drich]

In fact the nation calendar is officially the gregorian calendar for china!

When did I say it wasn't?

you being so stupid must be a gift to someone to me it is a brden because I have to explain common sense things to you that you will not believe from meand will want to argue. like the AD/BC calander...
IS THE GREGORIAN CALENDER !!!!!!
but what did you say??

Actually many nations don't use BC and AD, like China so are you saying they're stupid?

Since the gregorian calendar hallmark divides BC and AD and china does use gregorian calendar therefore china does use "BC/AD".

Do you see how much more polished my arguments are against yours?

Actually, they're not. In one post you criticize Catholics for being clueless about Christianity, that they don't know even how to read and then in the next post you praise their educational facilities -

reference please.
or is blind accusations just ok in your world?

needles to say that you contradict yourself because your arguments are just weak ad-hoc gibberish that even you don't take seriously.

again show me squirt. show me where I contradict myself.

Keep in mind catholic archives show the history of the church and where as church history is concerned there is no greater authority.

Now that said. Church history has nothing to do with Biblical Christianity. in fact sport there was a time where biblical christianity was banned in church history.. So you see if you see a contradiction it is due to a general lack of understand between the the church and the actual religious practice outlined by the bible.

The second thing is that Church did not invent the calendar but rather did a little improvement on Julian calendar and called it Gregorian calendar and it took them 300 years to do it.

Ah, no..



4:50 seco..

In 1263 Roger Bacon wrote a letter to the pope asking him to adjust the calendar and then in 1582, the Pope made the necessary changes with the advice of the German astronomer, Christopher Clavius. What he did is he decreed a change in the Leap Year system. Every fourth year was still to be Leap Year, but with a few exceptions. Years that ended in a double were not to be Leap Years unless they were divisible by 400. AND that's it - all the rest is the Julian calendar.

But as I said earlier, other Christianities didn't accept the calendar because they considered Catholics as idiots - just as you do in other posts when it suits you, you ad-hoc clown. Denmark and the Protestant parts of Germany and the Netherlands adopted the Gregorian calendar in 1700, but England did not adopt it until September 2, 1752. For many years afterward, the people of England kept both calendars, even though only the Gregorian Calendar was official. Also Greek Orthodox Church itself still refuses to accept the Gregorian Calendar to this day.

But if you want to talk about perfection the Gregorian Year is not perfect, it adds 25 seconds a year and actually Soviet government has adopted a new arrangement of Leap Years that is even more accurate than the Gregorian arrangement.

again sport, you are not arguing me.. Again that is why my arguments are far more polished than anything you have plagiarized. I source everyting and provide you with said source material if you want to dispute it then you have the option to address the source material.. but you do not seem smart enough to do that.

You seem stuck self identifying with your facts and you address my facts as if I self identify or self sourced this material.. Doesn't work that way in intellectually honest discussions unga.. You can just copy and paste someone else's research and claim it as a means to refute a legit source or in this case an world renowned scientist and Space/Time expert.

---

When did I say it wasn't?


Actually, they're not. In one post you criticize Catholics for being clueless about Christianity, that they don't know even how to read and then in the next post you praise their educational facilities - needles to say that you contradict yourself because your arguments are just weak ad-hoc gibberish that even you don't take seriously.

The second thing is that Church did not invent the calendar but rather did a little improvement on Julian calendar and called it Gregorian calendar and it took them 300 years to do it. In 1263 Roger Bacon wrote a letter to the pope asking him to adjust the calendar and then in 1582, the Pope made the necessary changes with the advice of the German astronomer, Christopher Clavius. What he did is he decreed a change in the Leap Year system. Every fourth year was still to be Leap Year, but with a few exceptions. Years that ended in a double were not to be Leap Years unless they were divisible by 400. AND that's it - all the rest is the Julian calendar.

But as I said earlier, other Christianities didn't accept the calendar because they considered Catholics as idiots - just as you do in other posts when it suits you, you ad-hoc clown. Denmark and the Protestant parts of Germany and the Netherlands adopted the Gregorian calendar in 1700, but England did not adopt it until September 2, 1752. For many years afterward, the people of England kept both calendars, even though only the Gregorian Calendar was official. Also Greek Orthodox Church itself still refuses to accept the Gregorian Calendar to this day.

But if you want to talk about perfection the Gregorian Year is not perfect, it adds 25 seconds a year and actually Soviet government has adopted a new arrangement of Leap Years that is even more accurate than the Gregorian arrangement.

Funny thing is most civilizations had something akin to a university Catholicism didn't invent such a concept

which was more like a vocational school which taught the lessor trades like how to be a doctor or barber or a scribe or how to be a better citizen/class and geopolitical indoctrination.

Science was a joke.

So yes I will concede there where forms of education but you would certainly not identify any of them or have them meet the same qualifications as a university would today.

---

Did somone say "the Dunning-Kruger effect"?


Do you even know what you're talking about here? In any case it probably doesn't have to do anything with this topic. It doesn't even have anything to do with my post that you're quoting which was already part of a awry from the topic.


Hmm, I don't know about that. Sure that some monks over the millennia discovered something here and there but that doesn't mean that the Church was pursuing science. Hell, by that logic you could say that shepherds used to pursue science because the first magnet was discovered by a Cretan shepherd named Magnes 4000 years ago.


I'm railing against god because I said how Jesus instructs you to pluck out your eyes if you look at a woman and think she's good looking and then cut off their limbs; as well as live like a bird because God provides the necessities of life - seems rather like you're avoiding to face the nonsense of the Bible and blame me for it.

There honestly nothing the church did that the pagans before it hadn't already done . Science in the ancient world easily surpassed most of the 500 of Christianity. In fact Christianity's own apocalyptic drivel did much to stall science .
[/quote]
which is why the julian calendar was almost 120 days off by the time the gregorian calendar went into affect..

Yes again there were attempts made, but the Church was the first to truly fund scientific research... or did you morons forget science cost lots of money and yield very little it direct marketable merchandise. Meaning before anyone could benefit from science someone had to dump money/lots of money into science before people could benefit from it. and again who beside the church had money to spend and influence across national boarders to implement the new science??

The bigger point you all seem to be forgetting in your arguments is the Church s credited historically to be the genesis of institutionalization of science as we know it.

Again not talk about some super douche sitting under a tree or climbing into a bath tub whle painting himself as a woman... but as a world wide study/focus group.

---

Neil Degrasse tyson herolds the gregoreian calander to the point he still says BC and AD because it is a genius level solid example of science in the church!

Arbitrarily creating a dating system which isn't that much better then other calendars and could easily have been invented without the church means nothing  

Not only that in the recent change from bce and ce NOTHING in the calendar changed.. do you understand the scientific significance of that?

It's not significant at all

Again Neil Degrasse Tyson is calling you out on that statement. He clearly think this is the best calendar ever devised by man. The modern face of Space Time science is calling you a liar. understand my rll in this is not to make the statement but provide you with his thoughts on the matter.

You my simply minded atheist buddy are not arguing me. you are arguing one of the greatest minds of our time here.

---

Do you see how much more polished my arguments are against yours?

You can polish a turd it remains a turd

Such a fool..

If what I said is represented by a polished turd, and it trumps what you have to say, it means you aint got shite to say bee-otch..